<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: INTERNET OBSCENITY!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://f11f.wordpress.com/2010/02/03/internet-obscenity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://f11f.wordpress.com/2010/02/03/internet-obscenity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:46:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obscenity: One More Shot in February &#171; FIRST ONE @ ONE FIRST</title>
		<link>http://f11f.wordpress.com/2010/02/03/internet-obscenity/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obscenity: One More Shot in February &#171; FIRST ONE @ ONE FIRST]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://f11f.wordpress.com/?p=397#comment-538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] months ago, I wrote about the circuit split created when the Eleventh Circuit refused to follow the Ninth Circuit away from local community [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] months ago, I wrote about the circuit split created when the Eleventh Circuit refused to follow the Ninth Circuit away from local community [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Obscenity Case Thrown Out &#171; FIRST ONE @ ONE FIRST</title>
		<link>http://f11f.wordpress.com/2010/02/03/internet-obscenity/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DC Obscenity Case Thrown Out &#171; FIRST ONE @ ONE FIRST]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 22:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://f11f.wordpress.com/?p=397#comment-498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the case for lack of evidence, Leon likely short-circuited any future Supreme Court case resolving the circuit split over internet obscenity.  The Stagliano case may be the last live Bush-era obscenity prosecution, and neither sets of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the case for lack of evidence, Leon likely short-circuited any future Supreme Court case resolving the circuit split over internet obscenity.  The Stagliano case may be the last live Bush-era obscenity prosecution, and neither sets of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capital Obscenity! &#171; FIRST ONE @ ONE FIRST</title>
		<link>http://f11f.wordpress.com/2010/02/03/internet-obscenity/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Capital Obscenity! &#171; FIRST ONE @ ONE FIRST]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 03:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://f11f.wordpress.com/?p=397#comment-482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  Posted in Anticipation by Mike Sacks on July 12, 2010   Back in February I wrote about the circuit split between the Ninth and Eleventh Circuit over the application of federal obscenity laws in the Internet age.  This is a major issue of law [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Posted in Anticipation by Mike Sacks on July 12, 2010   Back in February I wrote about the circuit split between the Ninth and Eleventh Circuit over the application of federal obscenity laws in the Internet age.  This is a major issue of law [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
