<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sotomayor&#8217;s First Authored Dissent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://f11f.wordpress.com/2010/03/30/sotomayors-first-authored-dissent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://f11f.wordpress.com/2010/03/30/sotomayors-first-authored-dissent/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:46:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://f11f.wordpress.com/2010/03/30/sotomayors-first-authored-dissent/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://f11f.wordpress.com/?p=715#comment-295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SCOTUSBlog adds another reason the ruling is pretty minor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SCOTUSBlog adds another reason the ruling is pretty minor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://f11f.wordpress.com/2010/03/30/sotomayors-first-authored-dissent/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://f11f.wordpress.com/?p=715#comment-293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with your analysis.  Scalia&#039;s felt need to repeatedly concur separately on the point brings to mind B/M and Stevens doing so for their causes as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your analysis.  Scalia&#8217;s felt need to repeatedly concur separately on the point brings to mind B/M and Stevens doing so for their causes as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
