I did a search of “Smith v. Clarence Thomas” and this came up:

Kenneth L. Smith, Appellant v. Clarence Thomas, Honorable, et al., Appellees

No. 10-5041

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

383 Fed. Appx. 8; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 13640

July 1, 2010, Filed

And below:

District court ruling decided 1/21/10.

“Mr. Smith seeks “a mandate from this Court requiring the Justices of the United States Supreme Court to hear all petitions brought to that body under a writ of error or in the alternative, a formal declaration that the Bill of Rights is null and void for want of meaningful enforcement.”

The “et. al.” are his fellow justices.